Loading...
Product engineering software · safety-critical systems

One requirement.
One unbroken thread of evidence.

PES keeps requirements, traceability, reviews, and validation evidence connected end to end — so certification programs stop rebuilding proof by hand and start shipping it.

DO-178C ARP4754A ARP4761 DO-330 aware DAL A–E
REQ-1042 · TRACE VIEW DAL B
System Requirement SYS-0087 · baselined Software Requirement REQ-1042 · reviewed Design Element SDD-0312 PR/CR Impact CR-0119 · flagged Code Module nav_filter.c Test Case TC-0391 Validation Evidence pending Audit Baseline BL-2026.3
The cost of manual process

Where certification programs lose time

Every gap below is a familiar audit finding — and every one is a symptom of evidence living in disconnected spreadsheets instead of one traceable thread.

F-01 · Requirement review overhead

The same checks, repeated by hand, every cycle

Each requirement is manually checked against its upstream requirements, checklists, and standards — review after review. It's slow, and the result depends on who happens to be reviewing.

F-02 · Weak traceability visibility

Impact paths are guessed, not shown

When a requirement changes, tracing its effect across system, software, design, and test layers becomes archaeology instead of a lookup.

F-03 · PR/CR management complexity

Change authorization has no single record

Requirement edits and their approvals live in email threads and change logs that don't talk to each other — audit trails get rebuilt after the fact.

F-04 · Validation prepared too late

Evidence is assembled, not maintained

Test evidence and audit readiness get compiled the week before a milestone, instead of accumulating continuously as work happens.

F-05 · No requirement engineering, no AI assistance

Current tools manage requirements — they don't engineer them

Mainstream tools store, track, and manage requirements, but offer no real requirement engineering — and no AI-driven assistance for drafting, decomposition, quality review, or improvement built into the workflow.

PES capability pipeline

Six stages. One continuous thread.

Each stage hands its evidence directly to the next — nothing gets re-entered, and nothing goes stale.

PES-01

Requirement Engineering

Decompose, import, and review engineering requirements against controlled baselines — with history that survives every revision.

Explore capability →
PES-02

Traceability & Impact Analysis

Track upstream and downstream relationships across system, software, design, and test artifacts in one view.

Explore capability →
PES-03

PR/CR & Review Management

Authorize edits, review downstream impact, and keep every change decision auditable from request to resolution.

Explore capability →
PES-04

AI-Assisted Self-Review

Configurable quality profiles flag ambiguity and gaps before a requirement ever reaches a formal review cycle.

Explore capability →
PES-05

Test Case Generation

Generate validation-oriented test cases directly from structured requirements and their trace context.

Explore capability →
PES-06

Baseline & Audit Readiness

Maintain review evidence, version history, and lifecycle records so audit readiness is a standing state, not a scramble.

Explore capability →
Built by engineers, not just developers

We've sat on the other side of the audit table.

PES is built by engineers with hands-on DO-178C and ARP4754A/ARP4761 background — not a generic project tracker retrofitted for compliance.

About Samhita Engineering →
READY-TO-USE TEMPLATES

Start from evidence you already trust

Planning documents, SRD, SDD, and SVCP structures aligned to a controlled lifecycle workflow.

Ready to put your certification evidence on one thread?

Request PES demo/discussion →